The resume is the site
humans barely read PDFs anyway. screening is agents + a URL. the site is for both.
If you hit Resume on my site, you get a short note instead of a file. That is intentional.
Resumes barely matter the way people pretend
For a lot of hiring now, no human carefully reads a multi-page PDF. A stack of applications gets skimmed by software, an internal bot, or someone pasting text into a model. The “resume” is often a lossy export that trails the real work.
So shipping another PDF felt pointless. The website already is the document, and it can be readable by people and by agents.
Built for both
Humans get projects, links, context, a booking URL.
Agents get structured pages, llms.txt, and other text routes. Paste sangeet.xyz into a screening agent. That is closer to how this generation of tools actually works than attaching Sangeet_Banerjee_Resume_Final_v7.pdf.
What a PDF would duplicate badly
- Timeline and stack that go stale
- Links that die on someone’s laptop
- A version I forget to update after I ship
I update the site when I ship. My PDF updated when I remembered. After someone asked for a résumé that was months behind live work, the gate felt more honest than a download.
What I tell recruiters
Use the URL. Or email hello@sangeet.xyz if you want a short human brief.
Some ATS pipelines still want a file. Fair. Feed them the URL or text exports, or ask. I am not maintaining two sources of truth so a footer date can look official.
One URL
The résumé is irrelevant as a separate artifact when the site is already the source and the machines reading applications prefer URLs and structured text anyway.